DRESDEN
ATHLETIC FIELDS COMMITTEE
LEBANON STREET
SITE SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT
April
25, 2005
The sub-committee met on April 11 and toured
the existing fields around Hanover High School. Jonathan
Brush was extremely helpful in pointing out the existing
infrastructure and potential problem areas. After looking
over the fields, we met inside and divided up responsibilities
with plans to report back with additional information. These
initial discussions broke down into the following major
categories:
Current Fields Disposition
Two important issues came up during our walking tour.
The first is the need to establish a specific boundary at
the far end (side furthest away from the school) of the
existing football field/track area. There is a fence there
that may or may not accurately reflect the end of the Dresden
property. Since the field/track is going to need to be moved
in that general direction due to the new parking area that
will ultimately be located behind the school, we need to
know exactly how much land we have to work with.
Another issue is a drainage pipe underneath the existing
field hockey field. At the far end of the field (furthest
away from the school) there is serious erosion where the
pipe comes out; if it continues, it could impact the field.
If we do choose to develop this field, the drainage pipe
will have to be addressed. The question of who is responsible
for this line needs to be discussed/negotiated with the
Town of Hanover ASAP.
Finally, we did not discuss any radical changes to
the existing soccer game field. I would think that as we
attempt to upgrade all the HS facilities, we would want
to try and improve this field as well; an example might
be resodding of some kind.
Action Needed:
Outdoor Track
The current outdoor track is not usable for competition
and barely acceptable for limited practice situations. Barry
Harwick investigated two local schools that have had fairly
recent experience with new tracks, Lebanon High School and
Windsor High School. After talking to people at both schools,
it was clear that site work and sub-structure was crucial
to a good final product. A sub-surface of between 18-24
inches is necessary in our climate to prevent frost heaves
and cracking in the track surface. Making sure that the
sub-surfaces are well compacted is also vital. A final point
in this area is that if the soil material is clay based,
and that is what we are dealing with, a moisture barrier
is also advisable.
Lebanon and Windsor had their tracks constructed
by a group called Cape and Islands and both have been pleased
with their work. The company has a very useful website that
can answer a lot of questions about track design and site
preparation.
Pathways also did a preliminary
analysis for the last fields committee and that had some
useful information as well.
Before proceeding too much further with this aspect
of the overall athletic field project, there are several
specific questions that need to be answered:
- How
much land do we have to work with? The standard distance
of an outdoor track is 400 meters; there is some flexibility
in how the oval is shaped to allow playing fields inside
and to accommodate the various field events.
- We
need to avoid the problems that plagued the existing
track construction. Is there a way to tie in the drainage
and sub-surface work for a new football field to make
the facility last longer.
- We
are assuming that we will want to host home meets on
this facility. This means that we have to budget for
the field event areas as well as determine where to
place them on the site.
- Decisions
on the number of lanes and the size of them will impact
the budget because bids are normally given based on
the number of square yards of material used for the
project. (This also ties in with question A in asking
how many lanes do we have room for?
Actions Needed:
Turf Field
Several forces have driven the overall committee's
work: Sharing of fields, making better use of fields, keeping
as many events as possible at the Lebanon Street site. All
of these factors point to having an artificial turf field
at the high school. Mike Jackson told the sub-committee
that for some sports, he would be able to schedule three
consecutive practices (or games) on a turf field. Maintenance
for the field would be minimal and problems with rainouts
would be virtually eliminated.
The sub-committee feels that with some work, the
existing field hockey field would be the best site for turf.
To get the full use out of the area, the existing field
would have to be enlarged. (This would allow a variety of
sports events to take place there since different fields
have different dimensions and the current size is too small
to accommodate some.)
Other points to consider:
- Manchester,
NH already has three turf fields used by the school
teams there and are planning to build a fourth. Their
administrators feel that the fields have been great
and are constantly utilized.
- There
are now a wide number of vendors that produce turf fields.
The product that was originally made called "astro
turf" is no longer in existence. New products are
much softer and have different textures to simulate
real grass.
- There
are a variety of uses for the field by the overall community
in the summer and other times when it would not be scheduled
by HS programs.
Actions needed:
-
To expand the field, we
need "fill". We can obtain that now from Dartmouth.
Do we pursue that now? If not, under what
kind of time line?
-
Dresden and Hanover need
to resolve the drainage pipe issue before we could proceed
with any kind of turf.
-
What happens to the teams
that currently use this field while it is under construction?
Lights
Lighting a field at HHS would allow practices, and
in some cases games, to be extended past the normal hours
of darkness which preclude the use of fields for outdoor
events. As with the turf field above, the lights would also
allow sharing, more efficient use of fields, and keep events
close to the HS.
The sub-committee believes that the combination of
a lighted turf field on the site of the existing field hockey
field would be the best way to proceed.
Cam Brown and Jonathan Brush have researched two
area schools, Lebanon and Hartford, that added lights fairly
recently. Both schools have been very happy with their lights.
Lebanon has had them for five years and they have had to
do no maintenance.
Factors to consider:
-
Light poles of about 70
feet seem to be recommended.
-
-
Options available include
"dimmer switches" and building replacement bulbs
into the contract after ten years.
-
Lighting companies now have the technology to "direct"
the light from the towers specifically onto the playing
surface to minimize the amount of light that is
reflected away. The company that installed the Lebanon
lights has a great website that illustrates these points.
http://www.musco.com
-
A final important point is that regulations must
be established to stipulate what hours the lights may
be used.The sub-committee has a copy of the agreement
between Dartmouth and Hanover for the use of the lights
at Scully-Fahey field and that is an excellent place to
start.
-
How high is the tree line
above the field? Can the light towers fit in below this?
-
Lights obviously require
power, how hard is it going to be to get the necessary
wattage to the towers?
Additional Conclusions
& Action Items
The first thing that needs to be done is to schedule
a meeting of the neighborhoods that abut the Lebanon Street
site. It is important that the Fields Committee keep the
community fully aware of what we are trying to do and to
solicit their input on ways to make the project better.
Secondly, the next phase is going to have a huge
budget component. The committee is going to need to be able
to present specific costs for each of the above proposals.
It is never too early to consider which parts of
the project can be aided by donated labor or material. (The
fill for the base of the turf field is one clear example.
The holes for the light towers at Lebanon were dug by Granite
State Electric; Hartford had considerable labor donated
for their lights project.)
Since the Lebanon Street site is likely to be the
cornerstone of the field's committee's work, we need to
coordinate our efforts with the sub-committees on sharing,
publicity and the development of the Norwich site.
|